引用第6楼costa0724于2009-12-30 08:13发表的 Re:oxynormer: 理论和概念 :
在精准上,我被禁言2周,所以我也不打算到那去玩了。这里是李老师的地盘,我想在这里跟您PK是最好的地方了,我想阿果的管理员不会随意禁我的言。(在精准,我是一介平民,您是武林名宿;在阿果,我可是果园红人,而您是果园常客。)要PK,您找我,不用死扣李老师的“科学不允许有例外”。我余大师尚且还有犯错的时候,李老师又不是圣人,说几句错话,你怎么老是得理不饶人呢?再说了,“Just follow your "科学不允许有例外" advice, there will be no 复杂性研究. ”这是互为因果关系吗?复杂性研究又不是李老师提出来的,你凭什么说there will be no ?你说没有就没有?那我说有呢,怎么办?上面我已经说得很清楚了,复杂性研究就是没事找事做而已,不要看有院士挂帅就稀罕得不得了。院士也是人,不是神,照样会犯错误的。
Today is new date on a new calendar. Let me clear several issues for you.
1. you were banned, not by the difference in number of posts.一介平民 & 武林名宿 are all equal in 精准. You were banned by your presumptuous behaviour.
2. As for "死扣李老师", I stated very clear in my rebutal.
As an oilfield worker, I'm sensitive and have the duty to correct wrong 理论和概念 that may lead to disaster. Please go back and read the debate again. He said , a blow out (BO,井喷) would not occur in overpressured shale. He clearly doesn't know what he talked about. I showed him a BO incident that occured just day before my post. and pointed out several papers clearly support my arguement. Unfortunately, he disregard them as "文献多如牛毛,若把它们放入垃圾桶里". For a person who make a living as a 老师, (some one who facilitates passing experiences from the one to another), his disregarding behaviour towards prior works is not acceptable and lead me to believe further discussion is useless.
The reason I replied to you are twofold, other than answering your charge, my other reason is to reply to Prof Li's 短消息. (BTW, he asked me to join this forum).
3. I joined 精准 is not for the purpose of becoming 武林名宿. Several 精准 adminstrators are my personal friends. Some are new members in ConocoPhillips GRAD program where I was a mentor. As a memtor and as a Chinese, I have disproportional share of non-US GRADs, eg asian GRADs. Majority of the 精准 forum members are young professionals and college students from China. Many are in some kind on mentor programs. I think I can treat them as future "GRAD" members and get them a head start. without tutor each individually. Also, it gives me a broader understand of their culture and thinking.I turned down an offer for 精准 admin because I thought I can speak my mind more openly.
4. As a mentor of an international major oil company, I work with top shelve students. Hence, I don't treat a person with a sheepskin from a top school differently than other member. (BTW, I have more than half dozen sheepskins my kids earned from US top 5 universities in my house ). In the GRAD program, as well as other mentor programs, Mentee can ask the mentor questions. How, asking question is a privilege and is not a right. Mentee does not have a right to demand answer/favour like you did in 精准. Your presumptuous behaviour lead to your banning. I select my mentees, mainly by his/her desire becoming a well rounded oilfield worker and his/her desire to contribute to human kind.
5. As a mentor, I pass my technical knowledge and my life experience (good and bad). I don't have the duty to tell you what you did wrong nor to settle a score with you or Prof. Li, I told you as well as other young persons the proper way to approach his/her mentors or future mentors. Based on my mentor experience, your behaviour is not uncommon among young chineses. In fact, I was told "不是个别现象,我们称之为“愤青”,是中国目前这种特殊政治环境下的特殊产物". I saw several talented but mis-guided chinese oilfield workers destroyed their careers by this unfortunately entitlement behaviour. Your education is a privilge but is not a right. A sheepskin is not a right to demand attention. You can ask but can't demand. You are not entitled to certain position nor career nor action from other. Only hard work and proven track record can do that.
Today is a new date in a new year, I hope you look yourself in the mirror, be honest with yourself and ask yourself a few hard questions, such as " What is the purpose of life?", "Why we study/work?","What do I need to do for..."
Good Luck
楼主留言:
关于油气倒灌的争论,我觉得在精准上已经讨论清楚了,先生没必要再把“战火”往这里蔓延,^_^